Skip to content

refactor: Bump jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3#10440

Merged
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:alphafrom
mtrezza:refactor/jsonwebtoken-9.0.3
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

refactor: Bump jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3#10440
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:alphafrom
mtrezza:refactor/jsonwebtoken-9.0.3

Conversation

@mtrezza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Apr 16, 2026

Bumps jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3 (patch).

Closes #10433


This is a replacement PR for the Dependabot PR #10433.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated authentication library dependencies, including jsonwebtoken to version 9.0.3
    • Consolidated and streamlined dependency management across the application

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a4ca5e24-433c-44d7-aa98-cf72d1671031

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbd1da7 and dffc7a6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Bumped jsonwebtoken dependency from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3, updating transitive dependencies (jws to 4.0.1, jwa to 2.0.1) and consolidating nested dependency graph entries across multiple sub-dependencies.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Updates
package.json, package-lock.json
Upgraded jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3. Updated transitive dependencies: jws 3.2.3 → 4.0.1, jwa 1.4.2 → 2.0.1. Consolidated nested/optional jwa/jws entries from sub-dependencies (e.g., @google-cloud/storage, google-auth-library, gtoken, web-push) to unified top-level entries. Updated resolved/integrity hashes and added license metadata.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is minimal and lacks required template sections like Issue, Approach, and Tasks that are specified in the repository's template. Add the missing sections from the PR template, including Issue (linked issue reference is present but not in proper format), Approach (describe the changes), and Tasks (mark completed checkboxes).
Engage In Review Feedback ❓ Inconclusive The check requires verification of engagement with GitHub PR review feedback through discussion threads, which necessitates access to the GitHub pull request interface not available in the local repository. Examine GitHub PR #10440 directly to review whether review comments were submitted, engaged with through discussion, and appropriately resolved.
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title 'refactor: Bump jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3' follows the required prefix format and accurately describes the main change.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses the requirement to bump jsonwebtoken from 9.0.2 to 9.0.3, updating both package.json and package-lock.json accordingly.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly related to the jsonwebtoken dependency update; the removal of duplicate transitive dependencies is a natural consequence of the upgrade.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check ✅ Passed JWT implementation demonstrates secure practices with explicit RS256 algorithm specification, proper token verification, and no vulnerable patterns identified.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Checkov (3.2.519)
package.json

2026-04-16 11:50:20,234 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:50:20,235 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:50:20,240 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:50:20,302 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Failed to invoke function /usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner. with package.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 88, in func_wrapper
result = original_func(item)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner.py", line 74, in
results = parallel_runner.run_function(lambda f: (f, self._parse_file(f)), files_to_load)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/ope

... [truncated 2547 characters] ...

[MainThread ] [WARNI] Secret scanning: could not process file package.json
2026-04-16 11:50:20,413 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Exception traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/main.py", line 647, in run
self.scan_reports = runner_registry.run(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/runner_registry.py", line 177, in run
for result in parallel_runner_results:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 118, in _run_function_multiprocess_fork
raise v.internal_exception.with_traceback(v.internal_exception.traceback)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.50%. Comparing base (cbd1da7) to head (dffc7a6).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on alpha.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            alpha   #10440   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.50%   92.50%           
=======================================
  Files         192      192           
  Lines       16792    16792           
  Branches      234      234           
=======================================
  Hits        15533    15533           
  Misses       1236     1236           
  Partials       23       23           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mtrezza mtrezza merged commit 163d7be into parse-community:alpha Apr 16, 2026
40 of 41 checks passed
@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the refactor/jsonwebtoken-9.0.3 branch April 16, 2026 23:19
@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This change has been released in version 9.9.0-alpha.1

@parseplatformorg parseplatformorg added the state:released-alpha Released as alpha version label Apr 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state:released-alpha Released as alpha version

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants