Skip to content

fix: retry_delay_ms reads from wrong config key (read_delay_ms)#3352

Closed
slymanmrcan wants to merge 1 commit intointegrations:mainfrom
slymanmrcan:bugfix/fix-retry-delay-ms-wrong-config-key
Closed

fix: retry_delay_ms reads from wrong config key (read_delay_ms)#3352
slymanmrcan wants to merge 1 commit intointegrations:mainfrom
slymanmrcan:bugfix/fix-retry-delay-ms-wrong-config-key

Conversation

@slymanmrcan
Copy link
Copy Markdown

problem
retry_delay_ms is being read from the wrong config key.
Currently it reads from read_delay_ms instead of retry_delay_ms.

This means the retry_delay_ms configuration is silently ignored
and always takes the value of read_delay_ms.

Fix

Changed d.Get("read_delay_ms") to d.Get("retry_delay_ms")
for the retryDelay variable.

retry_delay_ms was incorrectly reading from 'read_delay_ms' key
instead of 'retry_delay_ms', causing retry_delay_ms config to be
silently ignored.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented label Apr 19, 2026
@deiga
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

deiga commented Apr 21, 2026

Duplicate of #3247

@deiga deiga marked this as a duplicate of #3247 Apr 21, 2026
@slymanmrcan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Sorry for the duplicate, closing this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants