Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3af02cf5de
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| # Battalion Table / Pareto Table | ||
| battalion_plans = _load_battalion_plans() | ||
| pareto_cfg = ParetoConfig.defaults() | ||
| if os.path.exists(pareto_path): | ||
| try: | ||
| pareto_cfg = load_pareto_table(pareto_path) | ||
| except Exception: | ||
| pass # フォールバックでデフォルトを使う | ||
| pareto_cfg = _load_pareto_config(pareto_cfg) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After this refactor, build_system/build_test_system no longer import load_pareto_table, but both still call it in the shadow-Pareto branch. When enable_pareto_shadow is true and PO_CORE_PARETO_SHADOW_TABLE points to an existing file, that call now raises NameError, gets swallowed by the broad except, and silently leaves aggregator_shadow disabled, so A/B shadow evaluation and shadow-guard behavior never activate even with valid config.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.
Codex Task