Skip to content

Implement an eprintln! macro and replace the println! implementation in dbg! #616

@Alan632

Description

@Alan632

Replace the println! solution in the dbg! macro with a no_std implementation of eprintln! to target different debug message levels.

Early thoughts about what a 'no_std' implementation of eprintln! could be:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestinfrastructureTooling improvements for working on this repo (pipelines, automation, etc.)

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions