Skip to content

Questions about loss #8

@Kiljoon

Description

@Kiljoon

Thanks for the great work.

The "fixed-point correction" appears to be applied in a dense manner, as seen in RAFT and similar methods. However, the paper mentions that it is applied in a sparse manner. What are the differences in the results between these two approaches?

Furthermore, it seems that intermediate hidden states need to be stored to compute the fixed-point correction. However, changing the f_thres did not result in any difference in memory usage. Can you explain why this is the case?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions