Prerequisites
Problem Description
- When using kimi k2.5 for Sisyphus, we have the warning message:
Agent Sisyphus - Ultraworker's configured model ollama-cloud/kimi-k2.5:cloud is not valid despite kimi k2.5 already being a fall back model for Sisyphus.
- ollama-cloud/glm-5.1:cloud should be a fallback model
Proposed Solution
I think it boils down to:
- Registering ollama-cloud as a provider (nothing to do with ollama / local inference)
- Properly manage the
:cloud suffix that we have on all ollama-cloud models.
- Match
glm-5.1, and provide sisyphus integration & prompt
- Ensure we do not have messages :
Agent Sisyphus - Ultraworker's configured model ollama-cloud/kimi-k2.5:cloud is not valid despite kimi k2.5 already being a fall back model for Sisyphus.
Alternatives Considered
There's no direct alternative. Just accept the permanent warnings, and work like that. It's non blocking warnings.
Doctor Output (Optional)
Additional Context
No response
Feature Type
Other
Contribution
Prerequisites
Problem Description
Agent Sisyphus - Ultraworker's configured model ollama-cloud/kimi-k2.5:cloud is not validdespite kimi k2.5 already being a fall back model for Sisyphus.Proposed Solution
I think it boils down to:
:cloudsuffix that we have on all ollama-cloud models.glm-5.1, and provide sisyphus integration & promptAgent Sisyphus - Ultraworker's configured model ollama-cloud/kimi-k2.5:cloud is not validdespite kimi k2.5 already being a fall back model for Sisyphus.Alternatives Considered
There's no direct alternative. Just accept the permanent warnings, and work like that. It's non blocking warnings.
Doctor Output (Optional)
Additional Context
No response
Feature Type
Other
Contribution