WebAIM - Accessibility Report and TiddlyWiki

[pmario]

We did do something, but there is still a lot of room for improvement ;)

• The report: https://webaim.org/projects/million/#sample
• TiddlyWiki.com overview: https://webaim.org/projects/million/lookup?domain=tiddlywiki.com
• Detailed report with (screenshot with Errors only): https://wave.webaim.org/report#/https://tiddlywiki.com/#TiddlyWiki

IMO there are some log hanging fruits, like ALT texts for images and the "empty buttons" in the TOC sidebar.

The 97 Contrast Errors IMO are a bit harder to fix, but would highly improve our ranking.

The 103 Alerts are mainly caused by internal links, which are handled by JS - So they are a non issue

Screenshot Errors Only

[Jermolene]

Thanks @pmario we should certainly address the low hanging fruit as quickly as possible. For the contrast issues perhaps we just need to provide an optional accessible palette; maybe the “Contrast” palette already gives us that. Otherwise it would make sense to introduce an accessible palette as part of v5.5.0.

[pmario]

Yea the contrast has always been a pain. We did already change it with the latest palette overhaul. For most of the main content, we are at 4.13:1 contrast. But the WCAG AA demands 4.5 for our font size.

For WCAG AAA we would need 7:1 - In our case that would probably be a high-contrast palette.