Skip to content

overview.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
270 lines (200 loc) · 7.76 KB

overview.md

File metadata and controls

270 lines (200 loc) · 7.76 KB

Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSA) Overview

Introduction

Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSA) represent a unified framework for cognitive computing that enables the manipulation of compositional distributed representations using high-dimensional vectors. VSA provides a mathematical foundation for implementing symbolic reasoning with the robustness and learning capabilities of connectionist approaches.

This implementation provides a comprehensive VSA toolkit supporting multiple vector types, binding operations, and specialized architectures for various cognitive computing applications.

Key Concepts

High-Dimensional Vectors

VSA operates on high-dimensional vectors (typically 1,000-10,000 dimensions, default 1,000) where:

  • Symbols are represented as random vectors
  • Similarity is measured by vector distance/correlation
  • Robustness emerges from high dimensionality
  • Capacity scales with dimension size

Fundamental Operations

  1. Encoding: Mapping symbols to high-dimensional vectors
  2. Binding: Combining two vectors to create associations
  3. Bundling: Superposing multiple vectors (set-like operation)
  4. Permutation: Reordering vector elements (sequence encoding)
  5. Similarity: Measuring relatedness between vectors

VSA Properties

  • Fixed Dimensionality: All representations use the same vector size
  • Compositionality: Complex structures built from simple operations
  • Graceful Degradation: Noise tolerance and partial matching
  • Parallelizable: Operations are element-wise and efficient

Architecture Overview

Vector Types

Our implementation supports five vector types, each with unique properties:

  1. Binary Vectors {0, 1}

    • Efficient storage and hardware implementation
    • XOR binding (self-inverse)
    • Hamming distance similarity

  2. Bipolar Vectors {-1, +1}

    • General-purpose, neural-network compatible
    • Multiplication binding
    • Cosine similarity

  3. Ternary Vectors {-1, 0, +1}

    • Sparse representations
    • Memory-efficient for large systems
    • Flexible sparsity control

  4. Complex Vectors (unit magnitude)

    • Phase-based encoding
    • Fourier domain operations
    • Holographic properties

  5. Integer Vectors (modular arithmetic)

    • Finite field operations
    • Cryptographic applications
    • Discrete mathematics

Binding Operations

Different binding operations for different use cases:

  1. XOR Binding

    • Binary vectors only
    • Self-inverse: A ⊕ A = 0
    • Hardware-friendly

  2. Multiplication Binding

    • Element-wise multiplication
    • Works with bipolar/complex vectors
    • Not self-inverse

  3. Convolution Binding

    • Circular convolution
    • Preserves algebraic properties
    • Compatible with HRR

  4. MAP Binding

    • Multiply-Add-Permute
    • Robust to noise
    • Good for multiple bindings

  5. Permutation Binding

    • Based on cyclic shifts
    • Order-preserving
    • Efficient for sequences

VSA Architectures

Pre-configured architectures for specific applications:

  1. Binary Spatter Codes (BSC)

    • Pure binary implementation
    • XOR binding
    • Minimal memory footprint

  2. Multiply-Add-Permute (MAP)

    • Robust binding operation
    • Good capacity
    • Noise-tolerant

  3. Fourier Holographic Reduced Representations (FHRR)

    • Frequency domain operations
    • Compatible with HRR
    • Complex vectors

  4. Sparse VSA

    • Ternary vectors with controlled sparsity
    • Memory-efficient
    • Biologically plausible

  5. HRR-Compatible VSA

    • Wrapper for HRR operations
    • Seamless integration
    • Migration path

Getting Started

Basic Usage

from cognitive_computing.vsa import create_vsa, VSAConfig

# Create a VSA instance
vsa = create_vsa(
    dimension=1000,
    vector_type='bipolar',
    binding_method='multiplication'
)

# Encode symbols
apple = vsa.encode('apple')
red = vsa.encode('red')

# Bind symbols
red_apple = vsa.bind(red, apple)

# Bundle multiple items
fruits = vsa.bundle([apple, vsa.encode('banana'), vsa.encode('orange')])

# Query similarity
similarity = vsa.similarity(fruits, apple)
print(f"Apple in fruits: {similarity:.3f}")

Using Architectures

from cognitive_computing.vsa import create_architecture

# Binary Spatter Codes for efficiency
bsc = create_architecture('bsc', dimension=1000)

# MAP for robustness
map_vsa = create_architecture('map', dimension=1000)

# Sparse VSA for memory efficiency
sparse = create_architecture('sparse', dimension=1000, sparsity=0.05)

Encoding Data

from cognitive_computing.vsa import (
    RandomIndexingEncoder, SequenceEncoder,
    SpatialEncoder, TemporalEncoder
)

# Text encoding
text_encoder = RandomIndexingEncoder(vsa, n_gram_size=3)
text_vec = text_encoder.encode("hello world")

# Sequence encoding
seq_encoder = SequenceEncoder(vsa)
sequence = seq_encoder.encode_sequence(items, method='positional')

# Spatial encoding
spatial_encoder = SpatialEncoder(vsa, grid_size=(100, 100))
location = spatial_encoder.encode_2d(x=45, y=67)

Applications

Symbolic Reasoning

  • Analogical reasoning
  • Logic operations
  • Knowledge representation
  • Question answering

Natural Language Processing

  • Word embeddings
  • Sentence representation
  • Semantic similarity
  • Document encoding

Cognitive Modeling

  • Working memory
  • Attention mechanisms
  • Associative memory
  • Sequential processing

Pattern Recognition

  • Feature binding
  • Object representation
  • Scene understanding
  • Temporal patterns

Machine Learning

  • Feature engineering
  • Dimensionality reduction
  • Kernel methods
  • Neural-symbolic integration

Advantages of VSA

  1. Unified Representation: All data types use the same vector format
  2. Compositional Power: Build complex structures from simple operations
  3. Biological Plausibility: Distributed representations like the brain
  4. Computational Efficiency: Parallelizable vector operations
  5. Noise Tolerance: Graceful degradation with noise
  6. Fixed Memory: Constant size regardless of complexity

Comparison with Other Approaches

VSA vs. Symbolic AI

  • VSA: Continuous, noise-tolerant, fixed-size
  • Symbolic: Discrete, brittle, variable-size

VSA vs. Deep Learning

  • VSA: Interpretable, compositional, no training
  • Deep Learning: Black-box, learned, requires data

VSA vs. HRR

  • VSA: Multiple architectures, flexible operations
  • HRR: Specific to convolution binding

VSA vs. SDM

  • VSA: Compositional operations, symbolic reasoning
  • SDM: Memory storage, pattern completion

Design Philosophy

Our implementation follows these principles:

  1. Modularity: Separate vector types, bindings, and encoders
  2. Extensibility: Easy to add new architectures
  3. Performance: Optimized operations with NumPy
  4. Usability: Simple API with sensible defaults
  5. Compatibility: Works with other cognitive architectures

Next Steps

References

  1. Kanerva, P. (2009). Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed representation with high-dimensional random vectors.
  2. Gayler, R. W. (2003). Vector symbolic architectures answer Jackendoff's challenges for cognitive neuroscience.
  3. Plate, T. A. (2003). Holographic reduced representation: Distributed representation for cognitive structures.
  4. Rachkovskij, D. A., & Kussul, E. M. (2001). Binding and normalization of binary sparse distributed representations by context-dependent thinning.
  5. Levy, S. D., & Gayler, R. (2008). Vector symbolic architectures: A new building material for artificial general intelligence.