-
In the implementation used in the classic wires, the generators never use a resistance value. The softness/hardness of the source is not determined by the absence of a resistance, but by a flag. The magnitude of the generator corresponds to the effective magnitude taking into account the generator resistance, if any.
-
The mtln implementation is in a way simpler. Voltage(current) generators, if a resistance is not provided, assume a series(parallel) resistance with value 0(1e22) Ohm. If the generator is a current generator, the Thevenin equivalent is computed, and in the mtln advance equations only voltage sources are considered. However, I think these are always soft sources.
I think I had a misunderstanding considering that the hardness was somehow determined by the absence of generator resistance. In any case, wires with generators should produce the same results whether classic or mtln wires are used
In the implementation used in the classic wires, the generators never use a resistance value. The softness/hardness of the source is not determined by the absence of a resistance, but by a flag. The magnitude of the generator corresponds to the effective magnitude taking into account the generator resistance, if any.
The mtln implementation is in a way simpler. Voltage(current) generators, if a resistance is not provided, assume a series(parallel) resistance with value 0(1e22) Ohm. If the generator is a current generator, the Thevenin equivalent is computed, and in the mtln advance equations only voltage sources are considered. However, I think these are always soft sources.
I think I had a misunderstanding considering that the hardness was somehow determined by the absence of generator resistance. In any case, wires with generators should produce the same results whether classic or mtln wires are used